THIS IS SO WELL DONE IT SCARED ME
Honest Trailers - Divergent (x)
VIDEO: Colin accepts the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge and nominates Josh Dallas, Sean Maguire and Michael Raymond-James
I WILL REBLOG THIS TO INFINITY AND BEYOND. GET ON MY LEVEL.
Mr. Darcy is not to be teased.
@amyrathburg Challenge accepted! I nominate @joshdallas, @MRaymondJames and @sean_m_maguire! #ALSIceBucketChallenge
You don’t get to choose if you get hurt in this world, but you do have a say in who hurts you. And I like my choices, I hope she likes hers.
THIS DISTURBS ME WHERE DID THEY COME FROM AND WHERE DID THEY GO
If you use YouTube, you need to know this.
You’ve heard all these rumblings about Net Neutrality over the past several months. Let’s get real: this is about controlling online video. It is estimated that by 2017, video content will account for 80-90% of all global Internet traffic.
This isn’t just about not being able to binge-watch a series on Netflix. It’s about the future of online video as we know it.
Whether your YouTube channel is home to daily vlogs, short films, or just that one video from when the cinnamon challenge seemed like a good idea, you’re a video creator. Your content and comments help shape this community. Let’s keep it that way.
Net Neutrality means that your YouTube videos reach people at the same speed as clips from last night’s episode of the Tonight Show. It means a level playing field for video creators looking to reach an audience. But new Net Neutrality rules could mess that up.
Here’s the deal: Telecommunications companies already charge us to access the Internet through our homes and our phones. New FCC rules could allow them to also charge content providers (like YouTube, Netflix, and even PBS) for access to our eyeballs. It could create a fast lane for Jimmy Fallon’s clips, and slow lane for your YouTube videos.
It is really important that the FCC understands that online video creators care about Net Neutrality. Even if you’ve only ever uploaded ONE VIDEO, you are a creator and you have a voice.
If you can, please add your channel to our petition. We’ll deliver this to the FCC in September and demonstrate that the online video community cares about this issue.
steve rogers + cards against humanity (insp.)
#long story short people who say hook did everything he did just to get into emma’s pants are full of shit#because if all he wanted was emma and didn’t care about her happiness he would’ve taken that deal then and there#and he put his life in jeopardy going against it#he doesn’t look for a way out of danger while emma and people she loves are still in it#he’ll jump right into danger if that means emma will have someone by her side#and he’ll hurt anyone who threatens her or people she cares about (her friends…her parents…hers on - /don’t come near them/#he wants everything to be her choice and to uphold her autonomy without any manipulation#and he’d die to protect henry (don’t stop no matter what you hear) not only because that’s what she would want but because he’s come to care#for henry on his own#he wants to care for and support emma every step of the way but make sure no harm comes to her because of him#(what did you do? WHAT DID YOU DO?)#and he’d risk his life to save someone emma loves period#hook has grown and changed and evolved as a byproduct of love and tbh i think his redemption arc is the one i buy the most#he regrets what he’s done and he’ll atone for his actions by any means nessecary#so stop using things canon has blatantly sunk with this scene and countless others to justify your hook hate#it’s getting tiresome#i’m sorry he’s not a villian anymore??? apparently people would hate him less if he was still threatening to kill people but ok whatever#revenge is an end not a beginning (via killiancharming)
You were always ever beautiful amid the royal colours of the universe.